Here are some strengths/weaknesses for each group’s essay to consider as you prepare for tomorrow’s test:
Tori & Elysia:
Starting your writing with a unique introduction is always a good idea. They began with a story that served as a launching board for their analysis.
Referring to specific lines is a must. Cite the lines by number.
Don’t forget to address the structure of the poem if it is unique—this one is.
Got into a bit more detail with some of your points.
Kaley, Ben, & Tyler P.:
Because each of you projected a different interpretation, it was difficult to assess this one.
Say more about the structure—good job at least mentioning it.
Tyler, Trent, Austin:
As noted in class, your intro. was fine but unnecessary as an interpretation of the poem.
You did a nice job of addressing the lines as they occur chronologically.
Include a thesis statement that tells me where you’re going with your smaller points of interpretation.
Good job incorporating quotes into your answer.
Chaz, Derek, & Brandon:
Include a more overt introduction for organizational purposes.
Nice job annotating before writing.
Include some more specific details concerning the assertions you made.
For all groups:
Include a clear thesis statement. For example, “The author’s use of line structure and diction contribute to the poem’s emphasis on the feeling of loss one has when a relationship is broken.
Then, go on to discuss how line structure and diction do just that.
Monday, September 8, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment